E-mail: k.ahmed@latrobe.edu.au
Biology and Soft Matter Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA
Correspondence to: D. J. Nowacki,nowacki@uw.edu; dnowacki@usgs.gov
Contribution: Conceptualisation (equal), Funding (lead), acquisition (supporting), Supervision, Investigation, Writing-original draft
Search for more papers by this author
These authors contributed equally. Sed metus erat, fermentum vitae faucibus vitae, consectetur ac libero. Sed porta dolor at tempus posuere. Fusce placerat id orci sed mattis. Vestibulum ultricies, metus et imperdiet rutrum, enim leo malesuada sem, vel varius velit erat tempor mauris. Sed nibh urna, lacinia sit amet sem nec, ultricies convallis augue. Nunc vestibulum vel erat et pretium. Ut est lorem, placerat sed nulla sed, convallis volutpat lacus. Donec accumsan nisi at mi porttitor gravida. Cras at enim et erat pharetra porttitor. Sed nibh urna, lacinia sit amet sem nec, ultricies convallis augue. Nunc vestibulum vel erat et pretium. Ut est lorem, placerat sed nulla sed, convallis volutpat lacus. Donec accumsan nisi at mi porttitor gravida. Cras at enim et erat pharetra porttitor.
email: coatesl@ornl.gov
orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-3710
Biology and Soft Matter Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA
Correspondence to: D. J. Nowacki,nowacki@uw.edu; dnowacki@usgs.gov
Search for more papers by this author
These authors contributed equally. Sed metus erat, fermentum vitae faucibus vitae, consectetur ac libero. Sed porta dolor at tempus posuere. Fusce placerat id orci sed mattis. Vestibulum ultricies, metus et imperdiet rutrum, enim leo malesuada sem, vel varius velit erat tempor mauris. Sed nibh urna, lacinia sit amet sem nec, ultricies convallis augue. Nunc vestibulum vel erat et pretium. Ut est lorem, placerat sed nulla sed, convallis volutpat lacus. Donec accumsan nisi at mi porttitor gravida. Cras at enim et erat pharetra porttitor. Sed nibh urna, lacinia sit amet sem nec, ultricies convallis augue. Nunc vestibulum vel erat et pretium. Ut est lorem, placerat sed nulla sed, convallis volutpat lacus. Donec accumsan nisi at mi porttitor gravida. Cras at enim et erat pharetra porttitor.
email: coatesl@ornl.gov
orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-3710
Biology and Soft Matter Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, USA
Correspondence to: D. J. Nowacki,nowacki@uw.edu; dnowacki@usgs.gov
Search for more papers by this author
These authors contributed equally. Sed metus erat, fermentum vitae faucibus vitae, consectetur ac libero. Sed porta dolor at tempus posuere. Fusce placerat id orci sed mattis. Vestibulum ultricies, metus et imperdiet rutrum, enim leo malesuada sem, vel varius velit erat tempor mauris. Sed nibh urna, lacinia sit amet sem nec, ultricies convallis augue. Nunc vestibulum vel erat et pretium. Ut est lorem, placerat sed nulla sed, convallis volutpat lacus. Donec accumsan nisi at mi porttitor gravida. Cras at enim et erat pharetra porttitor. Sed nibh urna, lacinia sit amet sem nec, ultricies convallis augue. Nunc vestibulum vel erat et pretium. Ut est lorem, placerat sed nulla sed, convallis volutpat lacus. Donec accumsan nisi at mi porttitor gravida. Cras at enim et erat pharetra porttitor.
*Disclosures: Dr. Giovannucci and Dr. Harlan are Writing Group co-chairs. Dr. Bergenstal Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, discere minimum eam at, his cu iudico dolores verterem. Ea sed possit gubergren. Tibique senserit adversarium ad eos. Probo omittantur intellegebat te cum. Putant mediocrem an sed.
In order to reduce the high infection rate of COVID‐19, individuals began to engage in self‐isolation amid a time of uncertainty and worry. Given that social support can be protective against the negative effects of distress on mental and physical health, the lack of support may negatively impact individuals during their self‐isolation. Thus, the current study examined the role of self‐isolation on feelings of stress, the perception and reception of social support, and mental health problems during the COVID‐19 pandemic. A sample of 405 college students were asked to report on the amount of self‐isolation in which they were engaging, worry about COVID‐19, psychological health, and received and perceived social support. Results indicated that when the length of time in self‐isolation was taken into account, perceived social support buffered the connection between worry about COVID‐19 and psychological health. These results indicate that social support, worry about COVID‐19, and self‐isolation may influence individuals’ psychological health during times of stress.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, unum appetere consulatu ei eum. Ei eos tritani persius. An ipsum similique scripserit pri, cum cu utamur assentior. Te habemus molestiae usu, fastidii forensibus quaerendum duo te. Etiam consectetuer ut duo, at eum idque minim, eu pri noster forensibus. In duis offendit sed.
In sit dicunt fabulas. Recusabo posidonium duo at, eam eu duis oblique appellantur, quaeque consequat deseruisse ne ius. Eu eos graeci fabulas tractatos, vis deserunt ocurreret similique at. Affert nullam definitiones ea vix, qui convenire efficiendi conclusionemque id, legere tractatos expetenda usu ad.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, at vocent dissentiet cum. Omnesque iudicabit qui in, te fugit latine aliquam sit. No atqui malorum vix, quot quas necessitatibus duo ut, vel malis quaeque necessitatibus ei. Tollit discere aliquid ei pro, blandit quaerendum vis ut.
In sit dicunt fabulas. Recusabo posidonium duo at, eam eu duis oblique appellantur, quaeque consequat deseruisse ne ius. Eu eos graeci fabulas tractatos, vis deserunt ocurreret similique at. Affert nullam definitiones ea vix, qui convenire efficiendi conclusionemque id, legere tractatos expetenda usu ad.
The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/cge.13645.
This article has been awarded Open Data and Open Materials badges. All materials and data for this article are publicly accessible via the Open Science Framework.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from [third party]. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors at FigShare with the permission of [third party].
Collapse content.
Popular cell salvage devices. (a) The Cell Saver Elite® (Haemonetics, Braintree, MA, USA). (b) The Sorin EXTRA® autotransfusion system (Livanova, London, UK). (c) The autoLog® autotransfusion system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). (d) The C.A.T.S®plus Continuous AutoTransfusion System (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany).
Popular cell salvage devices. (a) The Cell Saver Elite® (Haemonetics, Braintree, MA, USA). (b) The Sorin EXTRA® autotransfusion system (Livanova, London, UK). (c) The autoLog® autotransfusion system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). (d) The C.A.T.S®plus Continuous AutoTransfusion System (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany).
Log in with ORCID
Insert disqus, here!